DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ©
BJG
Docket No: 7558-13
12 August 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 August 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 13
December 1988. You received nonjudicial punishment for larceny.
You were then notified that your commanding officer was
recommending you for administrative separation due to
misconduct. You exercised your procedural right to have your
case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). The ADB
found that you had committed misconduct, and recommended that
you be discharged with a general characterization of service.
On 17 November 1993, you were discharged with a general
characterization of service due to misconduct, and assigned an
RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
current desire to upgrade your discharge. However, the Board
concluded that your discharge should not be upgraded due to your
act of misconduct. The Board believed you were fortunate to
have received a general characterization of service. You are
advised that no discharge is upgraded due merely to the passage
of time or post service good conduct. In view of the above,
,vour application has been denied. The names and votes of the
Y members of the panes will be furnished upon request.
& :
Prt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
, the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
7a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3752-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 5 March 2014. In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, allegation that you were not guilty of the offenses, and current ‘desire to upgrade your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6032 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2014. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be upgraded due to your acts of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4156-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . -Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the | _ existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5170 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You exercised your procedural right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4182-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4162-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5192 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. You exercised your procedural right have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). On 11 December 2012, you received a general under honorable conditions characterization of service due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3216-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board dated 21 Senuaxy 1999, a copy GE which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5818 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2014. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be upgraded due to your acts of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6981 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 29 July 2014. On 13 January 1988, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct (COSO), and were assigned an RE-4 (not. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.